A movie and book review blog

Showing posts with label nimisha sajayan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nimisha sajayan. Show all posts

Jan 21, 2021

The Great Indian Kitchen : a movie review

The Great Indian Kitchen: the recipe for success as below.

Ingredients

  • One measure of the good
  • One measure of the bad
  • One measure of the ugly


Directions

Turn back the clock a hundred years. Retain electronic gadgets and newer modes of transportation from the current age. Combine all ingredients in a majestic old bowl house and whip them into a frenzy. Rinse-n-Repeat. Each day. Every day. Save the last dance.

The good: Some truths need to be made into films. As many films as you can, to hammer the point home. This movie would have been a decent documentary and could have even made it to a few international film festivals if it was made by a white woman film maker on a noble mission to empower and bring freedom to third world women. As a regional Indian feature film it found the right audience though - the local south (or north, with subtitles) Indian men who have been blissfully living their sedentary lives while their better halves toil from sunrise to midnight in the kitchen. If these wives work outside their home, the toiling continues at their work-place too. The cook-clean-perform wifely duties narration, executed in a minimally perfect style by the director, Jeo Baby, hits the mark. 

The fact that this movie got to be made as a feature film and not a documentary, thus reaching a wider audience, is inspirational. The dialog it has created on different platforms and groups is the ultimate goal of social impact films. The movie has a feminist theme and the female lead is the real lead of the movie with more screen-time than any of her male counterparts. Nimisha Sajayan is perfect as a new bride turned house-wife. Suraj Venjaramoodu has reliable job security as Nimisha's onscreen husband if her career continues on the upswing.

The bad (a tiny-bit frazzling): Why do I feel like Jeo Baby is Blessy in new clothes? Not that Blessy has gone anywhere - can't wait to unwatch Aadujeevitham when it hits the theaters. I am all braced up to re-read Benyamin's novel to get rid of the taste of the movie, which I do intend to watch in order to write a biased review right afterwards.

There was shades of Blessy in Jeo Baby's previous directorial venture Kilometers and Kilometers. The social cause part, a signature of Blessy's films was missing in Kms & Kms, but it made it up with a surplus of the virtuous characters without any real depth.

In The Great Indian Kitchen, the Blessyness comes from its  kitschy moralization, absolute disregard of grey areas and its social justice theme, which only focuses on the extremes. Unlike Blessy whose heroes were always those few good men in our midst who operate in a perpetual God mode, Jeo Baby is more open-minded and trains his camera on a woman, who since she is a woman has not unlocked the God mode

Like Blessy with his moralizing movies, Jeo Baby in TGIK, comes across as this self-righteous and principled unicorn crusader against the specter of patriarchy that hangs permanently over Indian woman kind, like grey clouds on a typical Seattle sky. TGIK must have begun its life in the spasmodic vibrations of a tuning fork triggered picking on the preachy sentiments of keyboard activists and social media warriors. The media - social and traditional is lapping up the spirit of revolution Baby's movie has unleashed on the morality militia. It is constructive in a sense, but anything holier than thou is a suspect in my book.

The suspicion proves valid when the audience is asked to believe the impossible. The story takes place at a huge family house spread out like a lumbering, grounded, two-storied jet plane. While it looks squeaky clean (except the kitchen/dining area which resembles a battle-field most of the time) we are asked to believe it does not have any full time retinue of maids or cleaners. Cleaning that house looks like a week long project. The kind of project that calls for project trackers, Gantt charts and responsibility matrices, and should only be attempted as a sub-project before bigger projects like weddings or funerals. But according to the movie, the new bride is expected to clean it every day? 

Then there was a tiny side story injected into the script that was totally unnecessary. The audience would miss the activist episode if they blinked. What purpose did it serve other than incite some fringe religious or political group? Maybe the intent was to create a PR controversy and make more people watch the movie? 

The ugly:  It is about half a century late. The story probably takes place in the early 1900s where they happen to have cellphones, cars and refrigerators. Or else in this day and age, where in Kerala is a woman routinely quarantined for almost a week due to her 'impure' menstrual period? 

There is no subtlety in the way the message of feminism is inflicted upon the viewer. I am as feminist as they come. But this movie is like someone's take on feminism after reading a few WhatsApp forwards on the subject and doing-your-own-research on YouTube. It goes from a dark feminist zero to a blinding hundred without passing through any modulatory gray zones in-between. 

Dance, according to the revelation I received after watching TGIK, is a safe and accepted career choice for female feminists in Kerala/India. Kerala is the highly literate Indian state where almost every millennial adult woman has a Bachelor's degree at the minimum, usually in a STEM field. But as a nascent feminist she will seek her emancipation only through arts or so the movie tells us. Not that there is anything wrong with arts jobs, it just doesn't make it through my ground truthing sensor.

Nimisha Sajayan who does not have a single dance bone in her body looks utterly out of place as a dance director in her new woke life. Even as she is reviewing the final rehearsal of her dance troupe, she is a detached spectator, her body feels rigid, while impassively watching a fluid dance performance which she supposedly directed. 

The last dance: The fusion dance group looks absolutely stunning - a beautiful blend of Thai/Far-east dance with Kerala's kathakali (in looks.)

Jeo Baby, go on make some more movies, now that the conversation has started, let's keep it going. Get this man some producers. 



Share:

Oct 7, 2018

Kannur : Inside India's Bloodiest Revenge Politics by Ullekh NP and a companion movie Eeda

Red - Kannur breathes and radiates red. From the laterite hills to the communist party flags and from its blood killing fields to its iconic Theyyams, red is the go-to color of this west coast city at the northern tip of the southern Indian state, Kerala.

With my personal connection to the place, it would have taken some significant amount of restraint to stay away from the red-jacketed book titled Kannur : Inside India's Bloodiest Revenge Politics by Ullekh N.P. The author is a native of Kannur and a journalist with Open Magazine.

The book tracks the history of violence and blood-letting that has become synonymous with the Kannur as the political killing capital of Kerala. Many faces and names of people appearing in these pages reminded me of people we might have ran into at an afternoon political discussion, at a panchayath function or at the neighborhood AKG vayanshala, all those years ago in the eighties.

My impression of the eighties Kannur, where Congress party and CPI(M) as the de-facto rivals contradicts the murders painted by numbers in this book. It is true that post-1990s, after the Babri Masjid demolition, religious fundamentalist organizations like RSS made considerable inroads into Kerala, one of the last bastions of the liberal left in India and thus replacing Congress as the main enemy for CPI(M) in Kannur. The passing of the mantle of the main CPI(M) enemy from Congress to RSS (BJP) is not evident from the narrative. At present almost all (if not all) the political killing victims are either Marxists or Hindu nationalists, Congress party members are nowhere in the picture.

The book also explores the question, why? Why did Kannur become the hot-bed, by exploring some unusual theories about the social, historical, genetic and geographic composition of the district and its inhabitants. From Chekavars to Assyrians to Portuguese it is fascinating to see various interpretations of history in an investigation to make sense of the mess.

...........

Eeda (translated as Here)is an excellent fictional companion piece for Ullekh N.P's book. It is a contemporary look at the political rivalries of Kannur through a Romeo-Juliet angle. Communists and Hindu nationalists stand in for Montagues and Capulets, while a young couple tries to escape the tentacles of their inherited political legacies.

Shane Nigam (Kismath) and Nimisha Sajayan (Thondimuthalum Drikthasakshiyum), the protagonists come from similar families in Kannur except their political affiliations - one with strong Marxist connections and other with Hindu nationalist leaning, which is the other side of the tracks as far as the other is concerned.

It is a smooth, natural flowing movie, the directorial debut of editor turned director B. Ajithkumar and Collective Phase One. Although other than the lead couple's accent, most of the other characters do not sound like locals, it is not because they didn't try. There is an impressive lineup of supporting characters essayed by Alencier Ley Lopez, Surabhi Lakshmi, Manikandan Achari, Sudhi Koppa and others.

Share: